By Jean-Jacques Lecercle
The aim of this publication is to offer an exact desiring to the formulation. English is the language of imperialism. knowing that assertion contains a critique of the dominant perspectives of language, either within the box of linguistics (the e-book has a bankruptcy criticising Chomsky's study programme) and of the philosophy of language (the ebook has a bankruptcy assessing Habermas's philosophy of communicative action). The ebook goals at developing a Marxist philosophy of language, embodying a view of language as a social, old, fabric and political phenomenon. in view that there hasn't ever been a robust culture of considering language in Marxism, the booklet presents an outline of the query of Marxism in language (from Stalin's pamphlet to Volosinov publication, taking in an essay by way of Pasolini), and it seeks to build a couple of options for a Marxist philosophy of language. The ebook belongs to the culture of Marxist critique of dominant ideologies. it's going to be rather valuable to people who, within the fields of language examine, literature and conversation experiences, have determined that language isn't basically an device of verbal exchange.
Read or Download A Marxist Philosophy of Language PDF
Similar social philosophy books
Gil Germain'sSpirits within the fabric international displays at the important function know-how performs in releasing humankind from the true international of house and time, and examines the extensive implications of this improvement for modern society. Germain argues that we should be cautious of our religious sojourn and indicates how one can offset technology's otherworldly impulse.
This e-book is a sustained list of Hamid Dabashis reflections over decades at the query of authority and the facility to symbolize. Who will get to symbolize whom and through what authority? whilst initiated within the strongest army equipment in human historical past, the USA of the United States, already deeply engaged in Afghanistan and Iraq, such militant acts of illustration converse voluminously of a much more deeply rooted declare to normative and ethical company, a phenomenon that would need to be unearthed and tested.
During this publication, Emslie establishes that narrative reasons are to be most well liked over non-narrative within the humanities. they're extra honest in senses. They either correspond extra heavily to truth and make allowance inference as to normative values. this is often quite the case while aesthetics are extra to the combination.
- The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government
- The Radical Attitude and Modern Political Theory
- Muslim Secular Democracy: Voices from Within
- Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology
Additional resources for A Marxist Philosophy of Language
From the standpoint of the science of language, ‘English’ does not exist: give or take a few parameters, and we move imperceptibly from one ‘language’ to another. For its part, the deep structure is universal and, from its standpoint, there is no difference between English and Quechua. In a sense, Chomsky is not mistaken on this point – but for reasons that he would probably not accept. As we saw in the introduction, ‘English’ is a cultural and political construct embodied in institutions (schools, the media, international institutions).
The organ of sight – is. It is called the eye and is the object of scientiﬁc study. This study does not simply explain the mechanism of visual sensations; it will also explain the role played by the brain in transforming these sensations into perceptions. And everyone will acknowledge that ﬂies, moles, raptors, and human beings do not see in the same way. I note in passing that scientiﬁc studies of sight do not (or do not any longer) feel the need to resort to the philosophical concept of innatism.
However, in addition to the fact that the theory is revised from top to bottom every ﬁve years, and nevertheless claims at each step to state the truth of the non-temporal faculty of language – prompting me to take it with a pinch of salt – the evolution of the theory is proceeding towards an ever greater abstraction, rendering its capacity to explain grammatical constructions (which linguistic science must explain) highly uncertain. To summarise. It seems to me that the reason for these uncertainties about the science of language is to be found in a decision that is not scientiﬁc, but philosophical, and which guides and constrains Chomsky’s scientiﬁc practice: the philosophical thesis of the innate character of the biological structure of language.