By James Crosswhite
Chapter via bankruptcy, Deep Rhetoric develops an realizing of rhetoric not just in its philosophical measurement but additionally as a method of guiding and undertaking conflicts, attaining justice, and knowing the human . alongside the best way, Crosswhite restores the normal dignity and value of the self-discipline and illuminates the twentieth-century resurgence of rhetoric between philosophers, in addition to the position that rhetoric can play in destiny discussions of ontology, epistemology, and ethics. At a time while the fields of philosophy and rhetoric have diverged, Crosswhite returns them to their universal moorings and indicates us an invigorating new manner forward.
Read Online or Download Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom PDF
Similar social philosophy books
Gil Germain'sSpirits within the fabric global displays at the important position expertise performs in releasing humankind from the genuine international of house and time, and examines the large implications of this improvement for modern society. Germain argues that we must be cautious of our non secular sojourn and indicates how you can offset technology's otherworldly impulse.
This e-book is a sustained checklist of Hamid Dabashis reflections over decades at the query of authority and the facility to symbolize. Who will get to symbolize whom and by way of what authority? whilst initiated within the strongest army equipment in human background, the USA of the US, already deeply engaged in Afghanistan and Iraq, such militant acts of illustration converse voluminously of a much more deeply rooted declare to normative and ethical business enterprise, a phenomenon that may must be unearthed and tested.
During this publication, Emslie establishes that narrative factors are to be most well-liked over non-narrative within the humanities. they're extra honest in senses. They either correspond extra heavily to fact and make allowance inference as to normative values. this can be quite the case whilst aesthetics are extra to the combination.
- The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy
- Time, Language, and Visuality in Agamben’s Philosophy
- Integral Pluralism: Beyond Culture Wars
- Archive fever : a Freudian impression
- Introduction au non marxisme
Extra resources for Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom
Or rhetoric is a way of using language to manipulate emotions, to stir up anger or prejudice or fear, and so to lead people to make judgments that they would not make if they were calm and reasonable. In the popular, modern understanding, the goal is to “get beyond all the rhetoric,” or to “get behind it,” or to “set it aside,” in order to be reasonable, in order to have a chance at finding out what is true or which course of action is best. Because this view of rhetoric is drastically out of line with much of the history of what has been written about rhetoric, drastically out of line with a long tradition of liberal education in which rhetoric has had a central place, and drastically out of line with the idea of rhetoric that will be developed in this book, I will start with a simple statement about rhetoric that contrasts drastically with the popular conception, let it stand, and then start again.
Because this view of rhetoric is drastically out of line with much of the history of what has been written about rhetoric, drastically out of line with a long tradition of liberal education in which rhetoric has had a central place, and drastically out of line with the idea of rhetoric that will be developed in this book, I will start with a simple statement about rhetoric that contrasts drastically with the popular conception, let it stand, and then start again. 16 WHAT IS DEEP RHETORIC? Rhetoric is a form of human transcendence, a way we open ourselves to the influence of what is beyond ourselves and become receptive, a way we participate in a larger world and become open to the lives of others, a way we learn and change.
Because] . . you would no longer be seeing an image of what we are saying, but rather the truth itself, at least as it looks to me. Whether it is really so or not can 33 CHAPTER ONE no longer be properly insisted on” (533a). The point is that the Good is not a being that can be seen and then described accurately. Logos leads one toward it, but does not arrive at it as at a destination, as if it were traveling in a kind of spiritual-intellectual space through the lower forms, up through beauty and justice until finally it reached that highest being, the Good.