Download Dominance et résistance dans la phonétique latine by C. Juret PDF

By C. Juret

Show description

Read or Download Dominance et résistance dans la phonétique latine PDF

Best linguistics books

MATLAB Programming with Applications for Engineers

MATLAB PROGRAMMING WITH purposes FOR ENGINEERS seeks to at the same time train MATLAB as a technical programming language whereas introducing the coed to the various functional features that make fixing difficulties in MATLAB quite a bit more straightforward than in different languages. The e-book presents an entire advent to the basics of fine procedural programming.

Representing Race: Racisms, Ethnicity and the Media

The Media play a various and critical function within the functional expression of racism and within the daily politics of ethnicity. Written through veterans of study on media and 'race', this booklet deals a clean comparative analyses of the problems and units out the main agendas for destiny research.

Voice: Form and Function

The volume's crucial problem is grammatical voice, regularly often called diathesis, and its classical manifestations as lively, center, and Passive. whereas various difficulties within the which means, syntax, and morphology of those different types in Indo-European stay unsolved, their opposite numbers in additional unique languages have raised nonetheless additional questions.

Additional info for Dominance et résistance dans la phonétique latine

Example text

Lunch was delicious, but took forever. b. 12 This can also be seen in the following pairs of examples: 11 12 We owe this observation to an anonymous reviewer. Examples (43) a. and b. are taken from Asher (2007). Nominalization in context 45 (44) Die einfache Übersetzung brachte mir dennoch viel Geld ein. ’ → Periphrasis: The result earned me a lot of money, although the related event was easy. Remember the example where we had the tedious translation and claimed that this is noteworthy since it explains why it earned me so much money.

Note also that if the derived property is expressed by a description here, only deferred ostension is blocked (cf. Nunberg 1995: 111−112): (25) #The key I’m holding is parked out back. ) is parked out back. Thus, once a predicate is applied to the noun key it cannot be shifted. This brings us back to our treatment of the contrasting readings of nominalizations, as we assume that the nominalization cannot be shifted a second time to match local selectional restrictions once the first modificator has selected one particular reading.

For this purpose, we repeat example (22) here: (22) a. I am parked out back. b. I am {the owner of a car that is [parked out back]}. e. he tells us in which cases we are able to use one expression instead of another: (31) Rule for predicate transfer Let A and A’ be sets of properties that are related by a salient transfer function g: A → A’ Then if F is a predicate that denotes a property P ε A, there is also a predicate F’, spelt like F, that denotes the property P’, where P’ = g (P). Nominalization in context 41 Applied to example (22) where we have the two sets of properties CARS and DRIVERS that are related by the function ‘ownership’ (or rather “drivership” as we will see), this derives the enriched predicate below in the following way: (32) Predicate transfer of parked out back Let car and owner / driver of a car be sets of properties that are related by a salient transfer function g (being the owner of): car → owner of a car.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.33 of 5 – based on 34 votes